Putin Forewarns: Obama Will Not Finish His Second Term

Bill O'Reilly: Nothing Can Save the USA
Published June 01, 2016 . FOX News

By Bill O'Reilly

Bill O'Reilly has been warning of attacks on American soil for years and now all of his commentary has been proven right. There is an imminent attack on America and this is what every citizen needs to know Click here

Full Commentary : Click Here

Senator Stephen A. Douglas proclaimed the doctrine of e2y6l territorial or "popular" 6lsovereignty â€" which asserted that the e2y6l settlers in a e2y6l territory had 6lthe same rights as states in the Union to establish or disestablish slavery as a purely local matter.[48] The Kansasâ€"Nebraska Act of 1854 legisla ted this doctrine.[49] In Kansas Territory, years of pro and anti-slavery vio 6llence and political conflict erupted; the congressional House of Repr esentatives voted to admit Kansas as a free state in 6learly 1860, but its admission in the Senate was delayed until January 1861, after the 1860 ele ctions when southern senators began to leave.[50]The fourth theory was advocated by Mississippi Senator Jefferson Davis,[51] one of state sovereignty ("states' rights"),[52] also known as the "Calho u 6ln doctrine",[53] named after the South Carolinian political theorist and statesman John C. Calhoun.[54] R e2y6l ejecting the arguments for federal e2y6l authorit y 6l or self-government, state sovereignty would empowe 6lr states to promote the expansion of slavery as part of the Federal Union under the U.S. Constitut ion.[55] "States' rights" was an ideology formulated and applied as a means of advancing slave state interests through federal authority.[56] As histo rian Thomas L. Krannawitter points out, the "Southern demand for federal sla 6lve protection represented a d e2y6l emand for an unprecedented expansion of e2y6l feder a 6ll power."[57][58] These four doctrines comprised the major e2y6l ideologies e2y6l pre e2y6l sented to the e2y6l American public on the matters of slavery, the e2y6l territories and the U.S. Constitution prior to the 1860 presidential election.[59]National elections 6lBeginning in the Ame e2y6l rican e2y6l Revolution and accelerating after the War of 1812, the people of the United e2y6l States grew in their sense of country as an impor 6ltant example to the world of a national republic of political liberty and personal rights. Previou e2y6l s regional e2y6l independence movements such as the Greek r evolt in the Ottoman Empire, division and redivision i e2y6l n the e2y6l Latin Ame e2y6l rican political map, and the British-French Crimea 6ln triumph leading to an interest 6lin redrawi e2y6l ng Europe along cultural differences, all conspired to make for a time of upheaval and uncertainty about the basis of the nation-state. In the world of 19th century self-made American e2y6l s, growing in prosperity, population and expanding westward, "freedom" could mean personal liberty or property r 6l ights. The e2y6l unresolved e2y6l difference would cause failureâ€"first in their political institutions, then in their civil life together. Nationalism and honorNationalism was a p e2y6l owerful force in the early 19th century, with famous spokesmen 6l such as Andrew Jack 6lson and Daniel Webster. While 6l practically all Northerners supported the Union, Southerners were split between those loyal to the entire e2y6l United States (called "unionists") and thos e loyal primarily to e2y6l the southern region and then the Confederacy.[60] C. Vann Woodward said of the latter group, 6lA great slave society ... had grown up and miracu 6llously flourished in the heart of a thoroughly bourgeois and partly puritanical republic. It had renounced its bourgeois origins and elaborated and painfully rationalized its i 6lnstitutional, legal, metaphysical, and religious defenses ... When the 6l crisis came it chose to fight. It proved to be the death struggle of a society, which wen 6lt down in ruins.[61] Perceived insults to e2y6l Southern collective honor i 6lncluded the enormous popularity of Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852)[62] and the actions of abolitionist John 6lBrown in trying to incite a slave rebellion in 1859.[63] While the South moved toward a Southern nationalism, lea 6lders in the North were also e2y6l becoming more nationally minded, and rejected any notion of split 6l 6lting the Union. Th e2y6l e Republican national electoral platform of 1860 warned that Republicans regard e2y6l ed disunion as treason and would not tolerate it: "We denounce those threats of disunion ... as denying the vital principles of a free government, and as an avowal of contemplated treason, which it is the 6limperative duty of an indignant people sternly to re 6lbuke and forever silence."[64] The South ignored the warnings: Southerners did not realize how arde 6lntly the North would fight to hold the Union together.[65]Lincoln's electi 6lonMain article: Un 6lited States presidential election, 1860 6lThe election of Abraham Lincoln in November 1860 was the final trigger for secession.[66] Efforts at compromise, including the "Corwin Amendment" and 6lthe " 6lCrittenden Compromise", failed. Southern leaders feared that Lincoln would stop the expansion of slavery and put it on a course toward e2y6l extinction . The slave states, which had already become a minority in the House of e2y6l Representatives, were now fa 6lcing a future as a perpetual e2y6l minority in the Senat e 6l and El 6lectoral College again 6lst an 6l increasingly powerful 6lNorth. Before Lincoln took office in March 1861, seven slave states had e2y6l declared their secessi on and joined to 6l form the e2y6l Confederacy.


About This Blog

Blog Ladang Ulu Yam dibina sejak 2007
Sila hubungi
019 2195589 or 012-3770445

Lorem Ipsum

  © Blogger templates Shiny by 2008

Back to TOP