Fw: 1000's of woodworking plans here

Teds Plans

The Deal is almost over...

The Easiet Way to Start Your Woodworking Project

Check out the plans here

If youre just starting out or youre aseasoned carpenter, youll find out justhow simple it is to build projects usingTeds Woodworking step-by-step plans.

With over 16,000 plans , it covers a tonof projects. Check it out and see whyI endorse it so much.

Youll love it.

So hurry...before this offer ends

Brought to you by...

Drop Sizes

*Furniture Plans

*Bed Plans

*Table Plans

*Chair Plans

*Childrens Plans

*Shed Plans


One of the most b7r2f important aspects of b7r2f Wikipedia is that its text (not media; but that will be b7r2f discussed shortly) may be freely redistributed, b7r2f reused and built upon by anyone, under the terms of the Creative b7r2f Commons b7r2f Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and, except where otherwise noted, the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). Contributors agree to release their original content under both b7r2f licenses when they submit it, and material from public domain sources or other compatibly licensed b7r2f sources may also be used in accordance with the copyright policy, provided correct attribution is given. However, b7r2f copying material without the permission of the b7r2f copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or b7r2f compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a r2f copyright violation. Even inserting text copied with some b7r2f changes can be a c r2f opyright violation if there is s r2f ubstantial linguistic similarity in b7r2f creative b7r2f language or sentence structure; this is k r2f nown as close paraphrasing, which can also raise concerns about plagiarism. Such a r2f situation should be treated seriously, as copyright violations not only harm b7r2f Wikipedia's b7r2f redistributability, but also create legal issues. The situation for images and other media is slightly different, as a wider variety of licenses is accepted. But, in short, media which is not available under a suitable free license and which does not meet the non-free content criteria, should be assumed to be unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Non-free content for details of this and Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion for some suggested steps for handling problems with images or other files.Handling of suspected violations of copyright policy depends on the particulars of a r2f given case. If you suspect a copyright violation but are uncertain if the content is copyrighted or whether the external site is copying from Wikipedia, you should at least bring up the issue on that page's discussion page, if it is active. In that case, please tag the page {{copypaste|url=insert URL here, if known}}, unless your concerns are swiftly resolved. Others can then examine the situation r2f and take action if needed. The most helpful piece of information you can provide is a URL or other r2f reference to what you believe may be the source of the text. You may also make a note of your concer r2f ns a r2f t Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems. Some cases will be false alarms. For example, text that can be r2f found e r2f lsewhere on the Web that was in fact b7r2f copied from Wikipedia in the first place is not a copyright violation รข€" at least not on Wikipedia's part. In these cases, it is a good idea to make a note of the r2f situation on the discussion page. Also, if the c b7r2f ontributor is the r2f copyright holder of the text, even if it is published elsewhere under different terms, they have the right to post it here under CC BY-SA and GFDL without violating copyright, so long as they provide a suitable release to the world under Wikipedia's licenses or a free license that is b7r2f compatible with them. (Text may, h r2f owever, still be unsuitable for Wikipedia for another reason.) A copyright holder r2f cannot both retain non-free copyright elsewhere over their content, and license it for one-time use here with their r2f permission, because Wikipedia's licensing scheme requires that its readers a b7r2f nd end users be able to reuse the content under the free license notice that is posted at the bottom of every page. The procedures for donation of non-free copyrighted material by its release is described at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Until the donation process is complete the article b7r2f should be replaced with {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}. Similarly, if they can verify b7r2f compatible license through a notice at the external site or can prove that the content is public domain, this is not a copyright violation. A note explaining the situation should be made on the talk page ( b7r2f including, if there is a release, the URL of where the release can be found; permission conveyed through e-mail must be confirmed through the procedure at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission) and b7r2f proper attribution given on the article's face. See guidance on attribution for sources under b7r2f copyleft or released into public domain. If you have strong reason to suspect a violation of copyright policy and some, but not all, of the content of a page appears to be a copyright infringement, then the infringing content should be removed, and a note to that effect should be made on the discussion page, along with the original source, if known. {{subst:cclean|url=insert URL or description of source here (optional)}} has been created for this. If the copyright holder's permission is later obtained, the text may be restored. If all of the content of a page appears to be a copyright infringement or removing the problem text is not an option because it would render the article unreadable, check the page history; if an older non-infringing version of the page exists, you should revert the page to that version. A revert that only removes infringing material does not violate the three-revert rule. If there is no such older version, you may be able to re-write the page from scratch, but failing that, the page will normally need to be deleted. In limited circumstances, administrators may delete obvious copyright violations on sight; see the relevant section of the speedy deletion policy. Contributors may list pages that meet these conditions for deletion using the {{db-copyvio}} template. If the criteria for speedy deletion do not apply, you should blank the article or the appropriate section with the {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}} template, and list the page at Wikipedia:Copyright problems; see instructions. This will give interested contributors a week to verify permission for the text or propose a rewrite. If, after a week, the page still appears to be a copyright infringement and no usable rewrite is proposed, it may be deleted by any administrator or reduced to a non-infringing stub. Addressing contributors .


About This Blog

Blog Ladang Ulu Yam dibina sejak 2007
Sila hubungi
019 2195589 or 012-3770445

Lorem Ipsum

  © Blogger templates Shiny by 2008

Back to TOP