1000's of woodworking plans here

Teds Plans

The Deal is almost over...

The Easiet Way to Start Your Woodworking Project

Check out the plans here

If youre just starting out or youre aseasoned carpenter, youll find out justhow simple it is to build projects usingTeds Woodworking step-by-step plans.

With over 16,000 plans , it covers a tonof projects. Check it out and see whyI endorse it so much.

Youll love it.

So hurry...before this offer ends

Brought to you by...

Drop Sizes

*Furniture Plans

*Bed Plans

*Table Plans

*Chair Plans

*Childrens Plans

*Shed Plans


One of the most 832pl important aspects of 832pl Wikipedia is that its text (not media; but that will be 832pl discussed shortly) may be freely redistributed, 832pl reused and built upon by anyone, under the terms of the Creative 832pl Commons 832pl Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and, except where otherwise noted, the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). Contributors agree to release their original content under both 832pl licenses when they submit it, and material from public domain sources or other compatibly licensed 832pl sources may also be used in accordance with the copyright policy, provided correct attribution is given. However, 832pl copying material without the permission of the 832pl copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or 832pl compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a 2pl copyright violation. Even inserting text copied with some 832pl changes can be a c 2pl opyright violation if there is s 2pl ubstantial linguistic similarity in 832pl creative 832pl language or sentence structure; this is k 2pl nown as close paraphrasing, which can also raise concerns about plagiarism. Such a 2pl situation should be treated seriously, as copyright violations not only harm 832pl Wikipedia's 832pl redistributability, but also create legal issues. The situation for images and other media is slightly different, as a wider variety of licenses is accepted. But, in short, media which is not available under a suitable free license and which does not meet the non-free content criteria, should be assumed to be unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Non-free content for details of this and Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion for some suggested steps for handling problems with images or other files.Handling of suspected violations of copyright policy depends on the particulars of a 2pl given case. If you suspect a copyright violation but are uncertain if the content is copyrighted or whether the external site is copying from Wikipedia, you should at least bring up the issue on that page's discussion page, if it is active. In that case, please tag the page {{copypaste|url=insert URL here, if known}}, unless your concerns are swiftly resolved. Others can then examine the situation 2pl and take action if needed. The most helpful piece of information you can provide is a URL or other 2pl reference to what you believe may be the source of the text. You may also make a note of your concer 2pl ns a 2pl t Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems. Some cases will be false alarms. For example, text that can be 2pl found e 2pl lsewhere on the Web that was in fact 832pl copied from Wikipedia in the first place is not a copyright violation รข€" at least not on Wikipedia's part. In these cases, it is a good idea to make a note of the 2pl situation on the discussion page. Also, if the c 832pl ontributor is the 2pl copyright holder of the text, even if it is published elsewhere under different terms, they have the right to post it here under CC BY-SA and GFDL without violating copyright, so long as they provide a suitable release to the world under Wikipedia's licenses or a free license that is 832pl compatible with them. (Text may, h 2pl owever, still be unsuitable for Wikipedia for another reason.) A copyright holder 2pl cannot both retain non-free copyright elsewhere over their content, and license it for one-time use here with their 2pl permission, because Wikipedia's licensing scheme requires that its readers a 832pl nd end users be able to reuse the content under the free license notice that is posted at the bottom of every page. The procedures for donation of non-free copyrighted material by its release is described at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Until the donation process is complete the article 832pl should be replaced with {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}. Similarly, if they can verify 832pl compatible license through a notice at the external site or can prove that the content is public domain, this is not a copyright violation. A note explaining the situation should be made on the talk page ( 832pl including, if there is a release, the URL of where the release can be found; permission conveyed through e-mail must be confirmed through the procedure at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission) and 832pl proper attribution given on the article's face. See guidance on attribution for sources under 832pl copyleft or released into public domain. If you have strong reason to suspect a violation of copyright policy and some, but not all, of the content of a page appears to be a copyright infringement, then the infringing content should be removed, and a note to that effect should be made on the discussion page, along with the original source, if known. {{subst:cclean|url=insert URL or description of source here (optional)}} has been created for this. If the copyright holder's permission is later obtained, the text may be restored. If all of the content of a page appears to be a copyright infringement or removing the problem text is not an option because it would render the article unreadable, check the page history; if an older non-infringing version of the page exists, you should revert the page to that version. A revert that only removes infringing material does not violate the three-revert rule. If there is no such older version, you may be able to re-write the page from scratch, but failing that, the page will normally need to be deleted. In limited circumstances, administrators may delete obvious copyright violations on sight; see the relevant section of the speedy deletion policy. Contributors may list pages that meet these conditions for deletion using the {{db-copyvio}} template. If the criteria for speedy deletion do not apply, you should blank the article or the appropriate section with the {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}} template, and list the page at Wikipedia:Copyright problems; see instructions. This will give interested contributors a week to verify permission for the text or propose a rewrite. If, after a week, the page still appears to be a copyright infringement and no usable rewrite is proposed, it may be deleted by any administrator or reduced to a non-infringing stub. Addressing contributors .


About This Blog

Blog Ladang Ulu Yam dibina sejak 2007
Sila hubungi
019 2195589 or 012-3770445

Lorem Ipsum

  © Blogger templates Shiny by 2008

Back to TOP